I've put forward this idea on here
before I think, the idea that a mediocre story well told isn't such a
bad thing. That presentation, if done right can go a long way to
winning you over, like, for example a well written book sticking out
merely for the virtue of being well written.
Now, I'm meandering so before I lose
sight of my point let me tell you about the film I watched last
night. It's called Cool World and through some random youtube
surfing I came along a full high definition upload of it, at first I
flicked through it mindful of its poor reputation but I found myself
absorbed by the animated segments and ultimately sat back resolving
to watch the full thing.
Its reputation is well deserved, Cool
World's plot is awful but thankfully it doesn't get in the way too
much, it's a film which mixes live action and animation much like
roger rabbit but here, unlike in Roger rabbit they don't mesh
together at all well to the point where it feels like two different
films edited together sloppily.
The strange thing about Cool World is
that had it been purely an animated film it would have been
infinitely more watch-able because boy does the animation kick ass.
A lot of it is psychedelic, creatures morphing from one form to
another while the antagonist Holly Would is amazingly well animated
being a very faithful reproduction of a woman. The sinister sleaze
of the cartoon town is the perfect antidote to the cheery toon town
in Roger Rabbit and in fact the pure atmosphere of the world alone
was enough to pull me through to the films ridiculous conclusion.
So, I can't for a second attest that
Cool World is a good film but I honestly really enjoyed watching it.
The characters themselves were shallow, the dialogue instantly
forgettably but the world was deep and chaotic and had so much
personality in itself it pretty much saved the show.
Am I purely just making an argument for
style over substance? Hell no, of course I'm not, I'm acknowledging
that substance comes in a lot of forms. Cool World is an example of
something that failed in almost everything that its medium requires
but it still took me somewhere, still entertained me and I feel
that's similar to what a great writer can achieve.
Through the colour and fluidity of
expression weak material can be redeemed purely by the scaffold the
writer produces to present it.
No comments:
Post a Comment